A First Step

posted in: Newsletter | 13

Tennessee State Representative Rick Womick, a former fighter pilot, unleashed some firepower in a speech in which he said that Muslims should not serve in the US military. Needless to say, the usual suspects, including the morally corrupt ADL, howled that Representative Womick is a hater and Islamophobe. Muslims were offended.

Representative Womick’s suggestion does not go far enough, but it is a good first step. How can this be? Why shouldn’t a Muslim serve in our military? A good Muslim must obey Allah and imitate Mohammed. And Allah and Mohammed divide the world into two classes—believers (Muslims) and non-believers. The whole group of non-believers–Christians, Jews, pagans and all others are named Kafirs. The majority of the Koran is about Kafirs and nearly all of it is negative. Mohammed became successful when he turned to total war against the Kafirs. He was involved in an act of violence against them on the average of every 6 weeks over the last 9 years of his life. A Muslim can kill Kafirs, but he is not supposed to kill other Muslims.

Koran 4:93 He that kills a believer by design shall burn in Hell for ever. He shall incur the wrath of God, who will lay His curse on him and prepare for him a mighty scourge.

When the US sends troops to fight against Muslims, what must the follower of the Koran do? Whose commands will he follow—Allah’s or Kafir officers’?

An American soldier takes an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies, both foreign and domestic. But, we have a problem here. A Muslim is one who follows the religious and political doctrine of Islam. What does political Islam say about the Constitution? Islamic political and religious doctrine says that Sharia is sacred law and must supplant our manmade Constitution. Will a Muslim protect our Constitution against political Islam? Maybe, but according to Islamic doctrine, he should not.

We must see the fallacy of: “I know of Muslims who serve in the military and they do a good job.” But do they do a good job because of Islam or by overlooking Islam? All Muslims have three modes of behavior—Meccan Islam (generally religious), Medinan Islam (political, jihad) and Kafir. Most of those who call themselves a Muslim do not follow Islam at all times. They may be cultural Muslims who overlook the political aspects of Islam and enjoy living in Kafir civilization.

But, and this is a big but, every Muslim, no matter how moderate, believes that there is no god but Allah and that the Koran is His perfect manifestation in this world. The majority (64%) of the Koran is devoted to the Kafir and it is massively negative, bigoted, murderous and hateful. Islam is profoundly and eternally anti-Kafir. So, serving in a Kafir military has a built in contradiction for any Muslim. Why should he serve those whom Islamic political doctrine denigrates in every way?

There is another contradiction about Muslims serving in our military—the more adherent they are to the Koran, the more apt they are to see their fellow soldiers as Kafirs and treat them as such. Mohammed would treat a Kafir nicely at first. But, there always came a time when the Kafir had to submit to Mohammed. The Koran has 13 verses that say that a Muslim is not the friend of a Kafir when it comes to Islam, so this is not a trivial problem.

But the major problem is that we Kafirs are not supposed to talk about whether a Muslim can serve in our military or not. We are supposed to obey the Establishment’s decree that Islam is an equal member of our civilization and cannot be questioned. The Establishment’s politically correct rules are that it is bigoted to want to talk about what it means to have someone in a critical security position who believes a text that is dedicated to the annihilation of Kafir civilization. It is frightening to read Islam’s sacred texts and see how cruel they are to Kafirs. The Establishment says that Kafirs cannot talk about their fears, because fears are irrational and immoral.

Why is it that the Establishment suppresses all attempts to talk about the true nature of Allah and Mohammed and those who follow them? Why can’t we talk about this and stop with the self-censorship? We don’t ask for the suppression of Establishment apologists. We Kafirs only want a forum to talk about Islam beyond the apologist/Islamo-philic bias. We want critical thought and debate, and fact-based reasoning, not insults and denial. Kafirs want a seat at the public forum, and not be shoved aside with insults. Kafirs want to talk about the implications of Sharia, the fruit of Islamic doctrine without being condemned, out of hand. Kafirs have always been the victims of political Islam and its Sharia. It is time for our side to be heard.

Why is the Kafir-centric view of Islam called bad/wrong/immoral? Why is talking about Islam’s hateful attitude about Kafirs wrong? Why can’t we talk about those who hold a political doctrine that includes violence against the very people who they are supposed to protect? Representative Rick Womick has started the conversation. But, we need to talk about a lot more than just Muslims in our military. Let’s talk about Sharia and political Islam in all aspects of our nation from the Kafir’s point of view.


Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink http://politicalislam.com/a-first-step/
Copyright © 2011 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com

13 Responses

  1. Ralph
    | Reply

    On this website, I have read a lot of what Dr. Mohsen El-Guindy and other presumably-sincere proponents of Islamic doctrine have written.

    The way I see it, Dr. Mohsen El-Guindy and others like him are absolutely obligated to continue making their points with great fervor, even if they don’t actually believe their own points anymore.

    It would be very difficult for me to discern whether a strong proponent of Islam such as Dr. Mohsen El-Guindy actually continues to believe the assertions of Islam or whether he continues to present the assertions of Islam only out of fear of being labeled an apostate and out of fear of then being possibly murdered by other followers of Islam who presumably have license under Islam to commit such murder of an apostate. In short, once you have become a strong, outspoken follower of Islam, you are quite stuck. If you want to defect, you might be murdered by other followers of Islam. Such is the way of Muhammad.

    Here is my sincere warning to anyone who is even remotely thinking about getting sucked into the vortex of Islam: You must be absolutely 100% sure that Muhammad is a true, noble, upright, honorable, loving, saving, selfless, self-sacrificing, life-preserving historic character worth following; because if you should later discover that you were deceived about the true nature of Muhammad and Islam and if you should then defect from Islam, you might end up paying for that wrong decision with your life when other followers of Islam murder you. Such is the way of Muhammad.

    The followers of Jesus the Christ, the Messiah, the Savior of the world, the Way, the Truth, the Life have absolutely no license to murder people who defect from following Jesus. Followers of Jesus have license only to continue loving and praying for other people. Such is the way of Jesus the Savior.

    I urge you to draw near to Jesus the Messiah, the Savior and follow Him all of your life. Cling to Him. Trust Him. He is worth following. He is the sure rock and fortress of all those who draw near to Him and cling to Him. He is the Way, the Truth, the Life.

  2. Stuart Parsons
    | Reply

    Dear Dr Mohsen El-Guindy. I read the Quran, the Sira of Ishaq and Tabari and extensively consulted the Sunnah.
    These Islamic sources, quite clearly revealed to me that Muhammad MURDERED all who spoke out against him and with the support of his deluded booty and sex motivated followers, he ENSLAVED, LIED, PLOTTED, TORTURED, KILLED, ROBBED, RANSOMED AND RAPED his way to absolute political and religious power.

    The Quran is a misogynistic, kafir hating book. If a genuine omniscient deity were to exist, it would be the grossest of insults to credit him with the authorship of these pathetic, evil so-called revelations.

    After an extensive study of Islam, I am convinced this evil system is a far, far greater threat to the well-being of mankind than Fascism and Communism ever were.

    Please everyone, remember freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We do not pass it to our children in the bloodstream. it has to be fought for, cherished like a loved one and passed on for them to do the same. Otherwise, we will spend our twilight years telling our grandchildren of the good old days when church bells rang, democracy, and GENUINE religious tolerance flourish and men and women were still free to speak their minds.

  3. pasha
    | Reply

    All this is just subjective opinions of individuals. One can only see the truth through his/her own life experience and applying logic analysis to these facts as one grows and matures.
    Here is my analysis: I met and meet many (dozens) of muslims in the place where people are born free and come to become free – the USA. Not a single muslim I met made an impression upon me that he/she is as free as the non-muslims. I see, feel, hear FEAR from muslims. They are afraid of each other most of all. And afraid of non-muslims also. You cannot discuss any topic with a muslim. They refuse. The only open topic for discussion is badmouthing america. When I tried to defend america (why would millions come here for hundredth of years), I never get a coherent response. I ask any islamic scolar to comment, deny, explain this FEAR. It is horrible. I want all people to be free of FEAR. That is the main purpose in life.

  4. Bill
    | Reply

    Islam is all about fear.

  5. Mike Ramirez
    | Reply

    I was previously aware of the Shia’ religious rituals of blood-letting and had a very vague understanding of the sectarian differences within the Muslim faith but didn’t pay much more attention to Islam until the attacks of 9/11 happened. What was planned to be my own personal journey to find out the truth about Islam resulted in an easy-to-read treatise that is posted free on the Internet at http://www.Starman3000.com

    As a result, a thorough reading from three versions of the Qur’an: Yusuf Ali; Pickthal; Shakir, along with studying the Ahadith: Sahih Bukhari; Sahih Muslim; Malik’s Muwatta; Sunan Abu Dawud, clearly explains why Islam does not teach the same God/Creator as mentioned within the Old and New Testament accounts. In the same regard, Islam also teaches a different account of Jesus whom they call “Isa”. Therein is the difference of why Islam’s method of establishing Peace on earth and Good Will toward mankind will continue to be at odds with the One who came to show that peace and paradise is not found under the shades of the sword as claimed by Muhammad (Bukhari: Vol 4, Book 52, No. 210) but within an individual’s heart that seeks and finds peace through love for God and love for all mankind – even those whom one considers an enemy. (Matthew 5:44) (Matthew 22:37-40)

    The message for mankind is that Peace will not be found through the sword; it can only be found when all mankind learns to put away the sword. (Matthew 26:52)

    The truth is that the Islamic ideology consisting of its rule by the Qur’an and Sharia Law is what governs and motivates the Muslim world to strive for world domination over all non-Muslim societies. As far as a “civil dialogue” Shi’a and Sunni Muslims have been unable to have that even among themselves ever since the year 632. Truth is: Muslims do not share the truths of the American Delaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution and are intent on shouting “foul” when we compare their ideology with the American system of governance, rights, and freedoms allowed for our citizenry. Islam and Western-style Democracy do not mix. The Islamic Laws of Sharia have should not be allowed as a co-governance within this nation. Islam has, for all intents and purposes, basically declared war on the U.S. Constitution – that’s all there is to it.

  6. Rembrandt_gg
    | Reply

    The doctor’s arguments are rehashed pro islam propagand and nothing else. This will work for someone who comes to Islam from other religions. They will assume Islam as a religion first and then build their knowledge of Islam from the assumption.

    They will assume mohammad as a ‘prophet’ and search the quran/sirat-rasulallah/tafseer (The Islamic Holy book, Life History of Mohammad, and the Commentary on Islam) for evidence of his honesty, courage, magnanimity, humility, leadership ability (all prophetic qualities).

    Sometimes the same people read through the entire quran at a stretch and take note of the actions of mohammad in the sira and then leave Islam quietly.

    At other times, they stick only to the parts where they ‘find’ mohammad to be prophetic. They don’t go over to the parts, where people who don’t believe in ‘mohammad’ are curse, vilified, and are made riot/rape targets for mohammadeans.

    For a really good view of what is in the Quran and what the average muslim is subjected to I would recommend the debates in the website http://www.faithfreedom.org

    The debates with Javed Adhmed Ghammidi some religious authority of pakistan is worth reading.
    Its available as a downloadable pdf.

  7. Steffen Larsen
    | Reply

    The good Doctor’s teachings are quite something. As usual I merely glanced through the wordy claims and this time my eyes fell upon something I saw repeated: that the word “kafir” was only used in the Quran to describe certain contemporaries. We of course can browse through any islamist website and see how the word “kafir” is used in abundance to describe the present day unbeliever, in contempt and scorn.
    The good Doctor likes to pretend that Mr Warner is not aware of the correct translation of the word “kafir”.
    Also there are some incoherent speculations concerning the stages of Western “moral decay”, in the best bigoted tradition of Sayyid Qutb.
    My only concern is that I have to scroll past the Doctor’s comments in order to come to something possibly sensible.

  8. Dr. Mohsen El-Guindy
    | Reply

    Contrary to Bill Warner’s belief, Kafir literally means a denier who doesn’t believe in Allah (God) and His Messengers. The word Kafir was only used in the Koran for certain contemporaries of the Prophet.

    The word kafir doen’t mean non-Muslims as Bill Warner promulgates here and there. In fact, this term was applied solely to contemporaries of the Prophet, in particular, to people from the tribe of the Quraysh. The Prophet peacefully conveyed to them the divine message over a long period of time, but they refused to accept the truth of his words. Allah, therefore, declared those people, the contemporaries of the Prophet as Kafirs. The use of the word kafir for anyone other than the contemporaries of the Prophet is not, therefore, permissible.

    Thet word kafir denotes an individual rather than a certain race or community. It is in no way a group appellation. However, the generally held view is that those who are not Muslims are kafirs. This is an entirely baseless supposition. The word kafir is not synonymous with non-Muslim. According to Islam, the truth is that those who are not Muslims are simply human beings In Islam man is either a brother in religion or a brother increation, both are entitled to full rspect..

    The Prophet of Islam received prophethood in 610. A.D. At that time all the people, save himself, were non-Muslims. When he addressed them to convey his message, he never said, ‘O Kafirs’, but rather ‘O man’ or ‘O people’ using the plural form. He continued to use this form of address throughout his life. That is, to him, all those who had not entered the fold of Islam were simply human beings.

    There are a number of examples in the Quran of references to communities or groups of those times in which the names, they themselves had adopted, were used. Never once was the word Kafir used. Here we give some examples from the sources of Islam.

    In the Meccan period, certain verses of the Quran were revealed which mention non-Muslims living outside Arabia. For instance, at the beginning of Chapter 30, the Quran mentions the Byzantines who had temporarily been conquered by the Persians. The Byzantines at that time were Christians, but the verses do not say “the Byzantine kafirs who have been defeated,” but simply “the Byzantines who have been defeated”. Similarly chapter 105 of the Quran mentions Abraha, the non-Muslim ruler of Yaman, but it does not refer to him as a ‘kafir ruler of Yaman’, but rather as the “man of the elephants”. (Abraha’s soldiers were mounted on elephants when he came to Makkah to attack the Ka’ba).

    There are certain injunctions in the Quran such as: “Fight the leaders of disbelief.” (9:12)

    This verse does not mean that you should start fighting whoever appears to you to be a ‘Kafir’or disbeliever. Such a war has never been fought in Islam, nor is it lawful in Islam. It would be sheer madness to take this Koranic verse in any such general sense.

    In this verse of the Quran, the word ‘Kufr’ relates to certain events. That is, the cause of war is not the fact of others being “Kafirs”, but rather to their being aggressors, i.e. this verse means that those of the deniers, who have waged war with Muhammad must certainly be fought, but as a matter of defence.

    At another place, the Quran has this to say: “Fight in God’s cause against those who fight you, but do not overstep the limits.” (2:190). That is, do not be an aggressor, fight only in defence. There are a number of such verses in the Quran, which show that war in Islam is not against Kafirs per se, but against aggressors. If someone is a ‘Kafir’, Muslims have been commanded to communicate to him the message of truth, peacefully, and as a well-wisher, rather than wage a war against him.

    According to the Quran, kafirs were solely those of the Prophet’s contemporaries, who were directly called upon to accept the truth by the Prophet himself, and who still did not accept it. Calling anyone else a kafir, besides those particular individuals, is in no way lawful in Islam. Kafir was a term of reference, restricted in place and time, and which is no longer relevant. Now all are equally human beings and they have to be dealt with as human beings.

    Similarly, it is also unlawful or haram in Islam to single out some individual or group as unbelievers and then hate them or wage war against them. According to Islam, those who are not Muslims are still human beings. It is the responsibility of Muslims to convey to them the divine message peacefully and affectionately. War in Islam can be waged only against an attacker and nobody else.

    So Muslims in the American army or Congess are loyal to their country, and to the constitution, but they believe in Islam, i.e. One God (the Creator), the God of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. They believe in all divine Books that had been mentioned in the Koran (scrolls of Abraham, Psalms of David, Torah of Moses, Gospel of jesus and the Koran of muhammad). But since the Koran is the last divine revelation to mankind, and has been guarded from corruption until the end of time, and since all other divine Books had been oblitirated or changed by additions and curtailments (the Gospel of Jesus has become five Gospels now ecach different from the other, The Torah is not there anymore, but the Talmud etc), Muslims resort to the Koran the one unified book that stood the test of time.

    As for this big fuss made about Sharia, Muslims everywhere apply Sharia only on themselves and not on others. They apply it regarding issues of marriage, divorce, inheritance, moral issues, treating parents and neighbors, dealing with the society and the economy, rights of men and women, orphans and children, prayer, pilgrimage, Zakat, charity etc.

    Muslims living in foreign societies do not apply punishment of capital crimes (murder and robery), in such issues they abide by the laws of the host country.

    So why doubting the loyalty of American Muslims in the army or Congress? Why spreading dissension and dispersion?

    Islam is a comprehensive way of life, and morality is one of the cornerstones of Islam. Morality is one of the fundamental sources of a nation’s strength, just as immorality is one of the main causes of a nation’s decline. Islam has established some universal fundamental rights for humanity as a whole, which are to be observed in all circumstances. To uphold these rights, Islam has provided not only legal safeguards, but also a very effective moral system. Thus, whatever leads to the welfare of the individual or the society and does not oppose any maxims of the religion is morally good in Islam, and whatever is harmful is morally bad.

    Given its importance in a healthy society, Islam supports morality and matters that lead to it, and stands in the way of corruption and matters that lead to it. The guiding principle for the behavior of a Muslim is “Virtuous Deeds”. This term covers all deeds, not only acts of worship. The Guardian and Judge of all deeds is Allah Himself.

    The most fundamental characteristics of a Muslim are piety and humility. A Muslim must be humble with Allah and with other people:

    “And turn not your face away from people (with pride), nor walk in insolence through the earth. Verily, God likes not each arrogant boaster. And be moderate (or show no insolence) in your walking, and lower your voice. Verily, the harshest of all voices is the voice (braying) of the ass.” (Quran 31:18-19)

    Muslims must be in controls of their passions and desires.

    A Muslim should not be vain or attached to the ephemeral pleasures of this world. While most people allow the material world to fill their hearts, Muslims should keep Allah in their hearts and the material world in their hand. Instead of being attached to the car and the job and the diploma and the bank account, all these things become tools to make us better people.

    “The Day whereon neither wealth nor sons will avail, but only he (will prosper) that brings to Allah a sound heart.” (Quran: 26:88-89)

    Allah sums up righteousness in verse 177 of Surat Al Baqarah:

    “It is not righteousness that you turn your faces towards East or West; but it is righteousness (the quality of ) the one who believes in God and the Last Day and the Angels, and the Book, and the Messengers; who spends of his wealth, in spite of love for it, to the kinsfolk, to the orphans, to the needy, to the wayfarer, to those who ask and for the freeing of slaves; and who is steadfast in prayers, and gives Zakah (Alms); and those who fulfill their covenants which they made; and who are patient and perseverant in poverty and ailment and throughout all periods of fighting. Such are the people of truth, the pious.”

    This verse teaches us that righteousness and piety is based before all else on a true and sincere faith. The key to virtue and good conduct is a strong relation with Allah, who sees all, at all times and everywhere. He knows the secrets of the hearts and the intentions behind all actions. Therefore, Muslims must be moral in all circumstances; Allah is aware of each one when no one else is. If we deceive everyone, we cannot deceive Him. We can flee from anyone, but not from Him. The love and continuous awareness of Allah and the Day of Judgment enables man to be moral in conduct and sincere in intentions, with devotion and dedication:

    “Indeed, the most honorable among you in the sight of Allah is the most pious.” (Quran 49:13)

    Then come deeds of charity to others, especially giving things we love. This, like acts of worship, prayers and Zakah (mandatory alms), is an integral part of worship. A righteous person must be reliable and trustworthy.

    Finally, their faith must be firm and should not wane when faced with adversity. Morality must be strong to vanquish corruption:

    “And God loves those who are firm and steadfast.”

    Patience is often hardest and most beautiful when it’s against one’s own desires or anger:

    “And march forth toward forgiveness from your Lord, and for Paradise as wide as are the heavens and the earth, prepared for the pious. Those who spend (in the way of God) in prosperity and in adversity, who repress anger, and who pardon people; verily, God loves the doers of the good deeds.” (Quran 3:133)

    These three acts are among the hardest things for most people, but they are also the key to forgiveness and to paradise. Are they not the best, those who are able to exercise charity when they are in need themselves, control when they are angry and forgiveness when they are wronged?

    This is the standard by which actions are judged as good or bad. By making pleasing God the objective of every Muslim, Islam has set the highest possible standard of morality.

    Muslims must not only be virtuous, but they must also enjoin virtue. They must not only refrain from evil and vice, but they must also forbid them. In other words, they must not only be morally healthy, but they must also contribute to the moral health of society as a whole.

    “You are the best of the nations raised up for (the benefit of) men; you enjoin what is right and forbid the wrong and believe in God; and if the followers of the Book had believed it would have been better for them; of them (some) are believers and most of them are transgressors.” (Quran: 3:110)

    The Prophet, may the mercy and blessings of Allah be upon him, summarized the conduct of a Muslim when he said:

    “My Sustainer has given me nine commands: to remain conscious of God, whether in private or in public; to speak justly, whether angry or pleased; to show moderation both when poor and when rich, to reunite friendship with those who have broken off with me; to give to him who refuses me; that my silence should be occupied with thought; that my looking should be an admonition; and that I should command what is right.”

    civilizations rise but eventually fall and die.There are many reasons for the decline and fall of a nation. Three aspects of decay are listed: social decay, cultural decay, and moral decay.

    The modern Western world and America in particular, increasingly continue its slide into immorality. The Barna Research Group surveyed American’s attitudes toward ten moral behaviors, and found that 60 percent consider it acceptable for unmarried people to cohabit. Fifty-nine percent believe sexual fantasizing is appropriate. Nearly half (45 percent) consider abortion acceptable, and 42 percent approve of extramarital sex. Thirty-eight percent approve of pornography, and 30 percent find homosexuality acceptable (“Morality Continues to Decay,” November 3, 2003).

    Nations most often fall from within, and this fall is usually due to a decline in the moral and spiritual values in the family. As families go, so goes a nation. If things go well with the family, life is worth living; when the family falters, life falls apart.

    Moral decline in America today is spectacular. The moral decline passed through successive stages.

    In the first stage, men ceased to lead their families in worship. Spiritual and moral development became secondary. Their view of Allah became naturalistic, mathematical, and mechanical.

    In the second stage, men selfishly neglected care of their wives and children to pursue material wealth, political and military power, and cultural development. Material values began to dominate thought, and man began to exalt his own role as an individual. The third stage involved a change in men’s sexual values. Men who were preoccupied with business or war either neglected their wives sexually or became involved with lower-class women or with homosexuality. Ultimately, a double standard of morality developed.
    The fourth stage affected women. The role of women at home and with children lost value and status. Women were neglected and their roles devalued. Soon they revolted to gain access to material wealth and also freedom for sex outside marriage. Women also began to minimize having sex relations to conceive children, and the emphasis became sex for pleasure. Marriage laws were changed to make divorce easy.

    In the fifth stage, husbands and wives competed against each other for money, home leadership, and the affection of their children. This resulted in hostility and frustration and possible homosexuality in the children. Many marriages ended in separation and divorce.

    Many children were unwanted, aborted, abandoned, molested, and undisciplined. The more undisciplined children became, the more social pressure there was not to have children. The breakdown of the home produced anarchy.

    In the sixth stage, selfish individualism grew and carried over into society, fragmenting it into smaller and smaller group loyalties. The nation was thus weakened by internal conflict. The decrease in the birthrate produced an older population that had less ability to defend itself and less will to do so, making the nation more vulnerable to its enemies.

    Finally, unbelief in Allah became more complete, parental authority diminished, and ethical and moral principles disappeared, affecting the economy and government. Thus, by internal weakness and fragmentation the societies came apart.

    So instead of codemning Muslims because they strongly adhere to the principles of their religion in the midst of glaring debauchery, Americans must be proud that Muslims are living amongst them, because they might acquire some of their moral traits.

  9. jim graybeal
    | Reply

    Is it too late for rep. Womick to declare for the Presidency ????? He’d have my vote.!

  10. Ron Pelton
    | Reply

    Well said. I am sharing this with my facebook friends. I hope the message gets through.

  11. The Political Informer
    | Reply

    A Muslim serving in the military is hypocritical on so many levels.

    Good post

  12. CH Martel
    | Reply

    The book, “Satan’s Trinity: Hitler, Stalin & Muhammad, is available at http://satanstrinity.wordpress.com/ For the first time in history “HSM” appear together on a book cover. The idea behind the book is to make headway against the ludicrous idea that Muhammad should be conjoined with any religious leader/founder. This book uses the specific names of Hitler and Stalin to efficiently identify the nature of Muhammad and by extension Islam. It compares the personalities and approach of each man to such categories as; war, peace, sex, torture, slavery, women, their respective childhoods and deaths, the critical affects of geography and timing, each man’s anti-social and narcissistic personalities. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=CHMartel&aq=f

  13. Uzoozy
    | Reply

    A name less article saying things about Islam , which the author has no knowledge.
    The Quran that I read does not talk about Kafir(non believers) 64 % of the time.
    Allah -the same God of Christains/Jews and the rest of the God fearing people.
    You did not mention that Islam holds Jesus(pbum) in very high esteem , the Vigin Mary has been given an entire chapter abd revered in Islam. Jesus is the Messiah, prophet and messenger of God
    Some people may fear Islam its not because of the religion , just fear of the unknown,
    May I suggest you reading the Bible and see what things you have mentioned Stoning prostitues is allowed.
    Cutting of hands , feet and eyes are also mentioned.
    The bible does not allow divorce and is done every day of the week
    Muslims are better Christains than most Christains, Muslim do not eat swine, pray to Allah 5 times a day Overall Muslims are better than a lot of other persons.
    Study Quran and you may get the blessing for those who understand and are wise and inspired by all mighty Allah.
    God bless you to become a better person.

Leave a Reply


8 + seven =