Political Islam is Islam's ideology about unbelievers, kafirs.
An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam
This newsletter is one of a series on the subject-Newsletter #10
Strategy--A Way to Defeat Political Islam
Moral Purpose
Before we discuss strategy, we must declare our moral purpose. Our moral purpose
is to defend the very existence of the culture of the Golden Rule, an ethical
civilization, from the 1400-year assault by the dualistic ethics of political
Islam. We must stop the continued killing of kafirs,
the enslavement of humanity and the spread of terror by Islam.
The Situation
Islam represents 20% of the world's population and is growing. Islam is united,
has a vision, a strategy and successful tactics.
Political correctness and multi-culturalism rule our world. Our government will
not help in this war and instead gives aid and comfort to the "minority"
Muslims. Our government is staffed by multiculturalists who will give every
edge to Muslims. Our schools have been occupied by the Muslim Brotherhood and
the dhimmi leftist
professors.
Kafirs are divided into Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, atheist, conservative
and liberal. Each of the divisions has further divisions. The relations between
the groups is marked by historical rivalries and hatreds. No group comprehends
the suffering of others at the hands of Islam.So not only do none of the victims
know their own story, they do not know the story of the others.
The Muslims have a great momentum. They are taking over by birth and immigration.
We have fewer children while Muslims have huge families. Osama bin Laden has
53 children. Demographic statistics show that France will become Islamic in
the year 2020. Run the population numbers.
Islam knows us well. Islam knows our history, secret shame, rivalries and hatreds,
weaknesses and divisions. Kafirs don't know anything about Islam. We may fear
and dislike it but that is just "feelings", not knowledge. Our so-called
experts (none of whom know the actual doctrine of political Islam) make apologies
and tell us that all of Islam's problems are caused by our poor governmental
policies.
We are filled with cultural self-loathing, demoralized, fatalistic, nihilistic,
too fat and too rich. (Wealthy people are weak at war, they have too much to
protect.) We have lost the mind of war and feel that "peace" is the
moral high ground. We are pacifists in the face of jihad. Our artists extol
the virtues of peace with no knowledge about what happens when peaceful people
are vanquished.
A Strategy for the Weak
At this stage of our intellectual and emotional development, our strategies
are limited. We are too weak to attack Islam and need an opening strategy for
now.
First, we must learn the doctrine of political Islam. We must know the enemy.
We must also know who our allies are and who are the allies of Islam. We have
two sets of enemies-the far enemy, Islam, and the near enemy-those who apologize
for Islam, the dhimmis.
The thought of actually attacking Islam is too frightening at this stage of
the game. However, we can make flanking attacks on our enemy's allies, the apologists.
Even dhimmis can think about attacking or pressuring the near enemy.
We can make a flanking attack on our enemy by attacking his strategies. We must
expose Islam through its doctrine from the Koran,
the Sunna (the Hadith and the Sira).
According to Sun Tsu in The Art of War, attacking your enemy's strategy is the
highest level strategy. And Islam's strategy is laid out in the Trilogy. We
now have the weapons, the books exposing their strategy.
Another principle of Sun Tsu is to shape the enemy. Islam always poses as a
religion to cloak their politics . It is useless to attack a religion, so Islamic
politics are under the radar. We must shape Islam as a political doctrine. We
must attack the far enemy-political Islam. This means that we attack Mohammed,
not Allah.
So we have a slogan for our opening strategy:
Build community
Expose the far enemy
Attack the near enemy
Community
We must form ourselves into a community. The term kafir civilization has been
used in this work, but this is not an historic fact, it is just a concept. However,
we must make ourselves conscious of who we are or we will lose.
When the Orthodox church in Bethlehem was destroyed by the Palestinian jihadists
in 2002, no one protested. The American Christians did not protest, the Hindus
did not protest, nor did the Jews protest, the TV/print media did not protest.
But when a mosque in Iraq got hit by American fire, everyone knew it. All of
Islam protested, along with their apologist allies. Moral: the Muslims are organized.
Kafirs do not even know that they are kafirs, much less be organized.
This must change. There are many ways for this to change, but one that we need
is a Web network community-call it kafir Web community.
The kafir Web community must carry out the functions:
Web site community
We have hundreds of Web sites that speak out against Islam. Each stands alone.
There is an informal group of people who may visit different sites and carry
information from one site to the other, but each site is an island unto itself.
Imagine that all of the anti-Islamic sites were members of a community site
list-serve. In this way, Web site owners could communicate among themselves.
This could serve two functions. One, we could mobilize, focus and coordinate
tactics during special times such as the Mohammed cartoon attacks. Two, there
are materials that it would be good for many to publish at the same time. For
instance, if this pamphlet were to be spread by the site network to all the
sites, then it could be read simultaneously across the globe. You get a much
better strategic impact from speed and a broad front.
And who knows what else can happen as site owners communicate with each other?
Personal Community
At this time most people personally know only a few people from church or another
social group who are working in some way against Islam. Even if you wanted to
meet someone else from your town how would you do it? This is a geographic grouping.
Another grouping could be writers, scholars, translators or jihad history buffs.
We need a way to form special communities (actually the Web site community is
a special case). We need to use the Web to form local communities.
The Swarm Community
We Kafirs usually act as individuals, but we must have ways to unite and attack
as a pack or swarm. Islam does this with great effect. When they need e-mails
or phone calls, they use the Islamic community, not individuals.
Swarm software would link a community of intellectual warriors with projects.
As an example, a project could be to protest the way an event was portrayed
in a newspaper. Let's further assume that the event came from a news-wire and
so is in many papers. We need a way for one writer to send a letter to all of
those who need it.
Local Politics
You live in a small town and wake up one day to find that Muslims, who moved
here a few years ago, are pressuring and making demands to use the school for
prayer during Ramadan. The ACLU howls if the Bible is taught in schools, but
makes no protest about the Islamic school usage during Ramadan
Or: you live in a city and when reading the paper, watching TV or talking to
a friend find out that Muslims are making demands that we change to accommodate
Islam. You feel helpless and afraid. Everything about these events seem wrong,
but no one in the media or government will even give guidance on how to protect
our very civilization.
Multi-culturalism says that even wanting to preserve your culture is biased
thinking. Political correctness says that any talk about Islam that is negative
or judgemental is hate speech or racist.We really don't even know exactly what
it is we are losing, but we are losing. We are losing a war that is not allowed
to be spoken of.
We must form a political community. We must have organizations that works at
the pure grass-roots.First and foremost, we need ways to teach people what is
going on. Islam will make demands on every area of our lives. Education, politics,
customs, medicine, art, law, funding will all have demands and pressure to change
to be more Islamic.
National Politics
Saudia Arabia and other Islamic nations spend billions of dollars each year
to spread Islam in the US. And what do we have to oppose this multi-billion
dollar political organization with a 40-year head start? A few volunteers with
no budget and no support. Who is going to win?
We must have national organizations that can support local politics. We must
lobby about national issues such as immigration and the massive Federal welfare
programs for Muslims.This means money. We must move from amateur status to professional
status. We must also have state and local organizations that can deal with lobbying
at the state and local level.
Friends and Allies
We are divided with many historical rivalries. Hindus dislike Christians who
try to convert them. The rift between Jews and Christians is an old one. The
Left is plagued by cultural self-loathing and disdain of Christians. Such is
the nature of humanity. This is no problem, except for one thing, these rivalries
prevent us from working together against our enemy, political Islam.
We must see the difference between a friend and an ally. We don't have to be
friends. We don't even have to like each other. America and Russia were allies
during World War II, but were never friends. We worked together for a common
cause.
Let's take a real life example from the viewpoint of a Hindu. The Dalai Lama
went to see the Pope at the Vatican in 2006 to talk about Islam. This was after
the Pope had quoted a Byzantine priest who criticized Islam as being violent.
Islam responded by rioting and killing.
.
Now the Dalai Lama is viewed as a friend by Hindus and the Pope is one of the
hated Christians. But the Dalai Lama told the Pope that he should not stir up
the Muslims and those "mischievous" jihadists. Mischievous? That is
what you call a child who deliberately does something wrong. But for the Dalai
Lama, killing and raping a nun is called mischievous. The Dalai Lama is a dhimmi
and the near enemy. So, in actual fact, the Dalai Lama is a friend to the Hindus
and an ally of Islam. The Pope is not a friend of the Hindus, but he is an ally
against Islam.
We need to stop acting like hurt children and realize that Islam will destroy
the Dalai Lama, the Pope, and the rest of us. We must start being allies or
the kafir civilization will be annihilated like the Hindu civilization in Pakistan
or the Christian civilization in Turkey.
The Ambassadors
To the end of healing our rivalries, we need to develop ambassadors. There are
already people who attend multicultural events, but an Ambassador is very different.
Those multicultural events, frequently religious dialogs, are about making and
being friends. (A dialog is a politically correct term that means no issues
which actually divide people will be freely discussed.) An Ambassador is armed
with the truth about the doctrine of political Islam and its history of annihilation.
They also know every groups' secret shame. An Ambassador represents one group
to another for the purpose of making alliances between rival groups of Kafirs.
Ambassadors set up frank discussions, not dialogs, between groups to strengthen
alliances. If friendships are established, fine, but making allies is the point.
The Doctrine Project--Knowing the Far Enemy
The doctrine of political Islam is not common knowledge. How can we come to
common solutions if we don't have common knowledge?
There are only two sources of knowledge about Islam-history and doctrine. The
history is complicated in two ways. There are the separate histories of each
religious and cultural group and most of the history has been deliberately forgotten-cultural
amnesia.
The problem with the Islamic doctrine is that until the 21st century, it has
been far too complicated for anyone except an imam, an Islamic religious and
political leader, to understand. We are fortunate that the complete doctrine
of political Islam is now available and can be easily understood.
The doctrine is the key to understanding Islam. And unlike the history, it is
pure and uncorrupted as Islam has proudly kept every single word preserved for
us to use for our own aims.Every action and thought of Islam is based upon the
Islamic Trilogy, Koran, Sira and Hadith. To know the Trilogy is to know the
heart and mind of Islam.
One of the best ways of knowing the far enemy is to know the political doctrine
and educate others about the essence of Islam. The doctrine has one overwhelming
characteristic-it is intellectually, emotionally, and ethically repulsive. We
must master the doctrine ourselves. It gives great power in thinking strategically
and tactically. In debates you can easily prevail over any apologist for Islam.
We need to sponsor training sessions for ourselves. Some people can learn from
reading alone, but others need a group to assist them. The trainings must also
include how to use argument and persuasion to defend our civilization.
Spreading the Doctrine
We must do is to put the Islamic political doctrine in service to our own strategy:
attack the near enemy and expose the far enemy. We must put the doctrine in
front of:
Political leaders
Opinion makers in the media and universities
Military, law enforcement and intelligence officers
Bloggers and others active on the Web
Other opinion makers
This list divides itself into those we need to see in person and those we can
reach by e-mail or phone. Political leaders fall into the category of personal
visitation. Committees must contact and educate officials about the doctrine
of political Islam. We should set a goal of a meeting with every Congressman,
Senator, and every governor. At the meeting we should express our fear of political
Islam and our fear of officials ignorance of Islam. The ignorance can be eliminated
by reading the books detailing the doctrine.Others should be contacted by e-mail
or letter and given a chance to receive the gift of books detailing the doctrine
of political Islam and its history.
We must let Mohammed speak for himself to the leaders, officials and others.
The Curriculum Project--Knowing the Far Enemy
Our public officials, diplomats, military and the media are all advised and
trained by the Middle East experts that are in our universities. The ideology
of the universities is totally driven by explaining everything about Islam by
its reaction to us. The political doctrine of Islam is never used to explain
what is happening or predict what will happen.
A computer search of a dozen universities that have Middle East degree programs
showed that not one degree program teaches the political doctrine of Islam.
Their graduates study Arabic language, Arabic literature, architecture, and
history. This is bigoted and illogical. Every act and word by Islam starts with
the Koran and the Sunna. It is impossible to even understand Islam without
knowing its view and motivation. So it follows that the doctrine of political
Islam must be added to the knowledge base that every graduate has to learn.
A graduate of these programs can advise officials and never have the slightest
clue as to what actually motivates Islam.
But one of the things that motivates our university elites is race and money.
It goes like this: about 30 years ago Saudi Arabia started pouring money into
our top universities. They funded chairs, gave donations to the departments,
built buildings. But then came demands. Islamic departments must not be headed
by white, kafir scholars. So Muslim scholars became the ideological drivers
in the university system. And the professors deferred in all ideological
demands. They serve Islam as self-loathing dhimmis.
So whatever, Islam wants, Islam gets at Harvard and other universities. We are
betrayed. Many of the universities are the near enemy.
We must create and implement curriculums at courageous schools that will teach
a program based upon the actual doctrine of Islam. We must turn out students
who can debate and write based upon the Islamic Trilogy. We must dominate the
market place of ideas and produce young minds that are not dhimmi-zed.
This would be a rigorous academic curriculum. Graduates could read Arabic, know
the Koran, Sira and Hadith. The history of the Islamic conquest of the universal
ethical civilization would be studied. They would know the suffering of the
dhimmi. Since they must be warriors, they must also study writing, speaking,
logic and persuasion.
Curriculum at Public Schools
Every public school textbook that mentions Islamic history has been vetted by
CAIR (a Hamas "civil rights" organization). To counter this we must
lobby to have the history of the victims of jihad and dhimmitude be added to
textbooks. We must let the pain of our ancestors be known.
Slavery and Curriculum
Every slave sold in America was wholesaled out of a Islamic
slave system that had been in existence a thousand years before they started
selling Africans to the Europeans. And Islam enslaved a million Europeans. All
of this history must be added to the public curriculum. Islam must bear the
historical burden that it deserves.
Women's Studies
Islam has a large body of doctrine about how to subjugate
women. However, feminist studies never give a critical look at the doctrine.
We must find ways to see Islam's doctrine about women is taught.
Bill Warner
Signup for our weekly newletter.
copyright 2008, CBSX, Inc. dba politicalislam.com
Use this as you will, just do not edit and give us credit.
Permalink: /blog/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-10/
Ban Islam for past and present War Crimes
Muhammed: The Con Man and False Prophet
As we are against terrorism in the world for the ultimate survival of our society, I’m offering viewpoints to win the battle against Islam’s goal of world domination, which is stated in their writings.
Muhammed and his sayings, found in the Koran, Hadiths, Sunnahs and Surahs, are the root of Muslim terrorism.
With truth and reality, we must discredit the founder of Islam, his sayings and the belief system that spawns this terrorism.
Let the world know that Muhammed, while in Medina, organized raids on camel trains hauling trade goods, and received twenty percent (20%) of the ill gotten loot. The spiritual mechanics of functioning as a Prophet does not mix with being a thief and killing for wealth.
Let the world know that Muhammed betrothed a six year old (6) child , in her ninth year (9) consummated their marriage sexually. He was in his fifties (50’s) at the time. The inner development of a Prophet does not function with paedophilia. Muhammed was a Paedophile. He claimed that Aisha was his only wife that caused him to experience revelations while under the blanket with her. Muhammeds counsel to others and actions, legitimized paedophilia through Islams ideology. What was the source of Muhammeds revelations as a Paedophile? All this is stated in th Hadiths and Surahs.
On returning to Medina after taking Mecca, he attacked one of the Jewish tribes, the Qurraysa. After 28 days of siege, the Jews capitulated. Muhammed immediately ignored the terms agreed upon as part of their surrender. He ordered and watched as all males from puberty on were beheaded in a trench. Their families were made to watch this slaughter of the male children and men. Some of the women became hysterical while watching the beheading of their husbands and sons and were also beheaded. During the slaughter, Muhammed spotted a beautiful Jewish girl and selected her for his sex slave. Her name was Rayhannah. She had to watch while her mother and sister were raped. Her sister was traded as a slave for arms which is stated in both the Hadiths and the Surahs. There were three tribal groups of Jewish origin and belief in Medina at that time. Those that weren’t killed or sold into slavery were forced out into the desert to die.
These atrocities are the actions of a demonic fiend not a Prophet.
Muhammed also encouraged and rewarded many assassinations in his lifetime. Murder is not an activity of a Prophet.
The fantasy paradise that Muhammed developed to entice the itinerant, uneducated Arabs to Islam is a personal bordello. This paradise in the hereafter shows a sexual fixation and addiction in the spirit of Muhammed. This is not the development of a spiritual Prophet. This demonic personality is no doubt the most successful con man ever. Muhammed has been more successful than Hitler and the Nazi movement in longevity, size of his organization and hatred of the Jews.
Compare Muhammed to all former Prophets and founders of great religious movements, East and West, and it easily shows us how debased he was. His organization was developed by tacking spiritual words to robbery, killing, conversions by the sword and terrorism with Fatwas which are all fiendish acts. This activity by his followers is presently seen on television clips with kidnapped, innocent people being beheaded in praise of Allah.
Last but not least, Allah was one of over two hundred and fifty (250) idols in the Ka’aba. After taking Mecca, Muhammed destroyed all other tribal idols except for the Quraysh tribe’s idol and pronounced Allah the one and only God.
I believe that, in warfare against terrorism, we must attack the heart and not just the tentacles of Islam with truth. We must not let this perversion of religion spawn numberless adherents to Muhammed’s words to expand their terrorism. We must confront terrorism head on.
When combating Evil remember: Appeasement is like feeding a steak to a tiger in the hope that it will eventually become a vegetarian.
International Ban Islam petition:
http://www.petitiononline.com/MYSTIC/petition.html
Canada’s for debate in the House of Commons:
http://www.petitiononline.com/GUARDIAN/
Guardians of Democracy site:
http://mypage.direct.ca/l/lbouchar/
Unfortunately, Muslims in debate or negotiations are forced to LIE to preserve Islam’s integrity. This noble Islamic activity is called “TAKIYA”."
Lorenzo Bouchard — June 11, 2008 @ 7:57 PM
mal — June 13, 2008 @ 2:49 PM
Our governments are ignoring the problem.
Enough written comments, who will walk the talk."
Lorenzo Bouchard — August 24, 2008 @ 1:35 AM
Against Jihadi Genocide
Free Will and Candor will Prevail
Against the bloody Muslim Hell
We Choose the Freedom of the Thought
To Muslim Beast we Bow Not
Each individual is precious
Responsible he’s and courageous
Let the Thousand Flowers blossom
Fear Not the vile Colossus
We will smash it into dust
Overcome the Lies we must
Against the darkest Muslim Night
We Choose our Might and we are Right
We’re Free as long We Do No Harm
We care and tend for our young
We stand Opposed to the Oppression
To weak and gentle our Protection
The wicked Lies reject we must
In God of Truth we put our Trust."
Will48 — December 11, 2008 @ 5:46 AM
Any culture that violates the Golden Rule ethics of NO COERCION by having apostasy punishable by DEATH has no right to exist and to oppress its subjects' right to freedom of Choice and Thought, and to free and unimpeded access to full and truthful information."
Will48 — December 11, 2008 @ 6:14 AM
Gene Callahan — April 6, 2009 @ 11:11 AM
Rashaad Price — April 26, 2009 @ 12:09 PM
Jews in turn are taught to hate muslims .Thus we have a circle of hatred by men who profess to love God .only a great awakening in all these people can alert them to the fact that they are being played by satan.these peoples must unite in order to drag man from the edge of the abyss.Hatred blinds men.It saps their enegy.It destroys their potential.In the end they will become even less than animals.Is this what you want because this is the direction you are heading"
Rashaad Price — April 26, 2009 @ 12:20 PM
Joe — October 3, 2009 @ 6:48 PM
Cecil Kent — January 2, 2010 @ 7:12 PM
Cecil Kent — January 5, 2010 @ 9:52 AM
Political scientists are the ones who should be sounding the alarm against political Islam, but where are they?
I can assure you, the soldiers on the front lines who meet with Moslems immigrants every day are becoming aware of the contempt, hatred, condescension, revulsion and apartheid intrinisic to Islam.
We are hated by Moslems merely because we exist. It is Allah's will.
In Europe and North America, the populations of 'ordinary people' seem to reaching a turning point where they realize there are many Jihad Janes in the Moslem community and that she represents normative Islam."
Democracyistheanswer — March 23, 2010 @ 8:02 PM
I'd like to see reliable sources (not written by your circle of friends in the anti-Islam movement) describing the "crimes" Muhammad supposedly committed.
In the early Muslim empires, dhimmi, or nonbelievers, were treated much better than you assert. They didn't have complete freedom, but much more freedom than Muslims under the rule of Christian Europeans did.
What you describe as Muslim philosophy of hate is not followed by most Muslims (indeed, radical Muslims hate the secular "jahili" Muslim states at least as much as they hate kafirs). Radical Islamism more or less originated with Sayyid Qutb and the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1950s-60s.
To cut this off short so it doesn't look too much like the walls of moronic blabber from your bigoted friends:
You are a moron. Shut up."
I am not Muslim — April 16, 2010 @ 7:47 PM
Reply to this Post: