An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 11

This newsletter is one of a series on the subject:

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam Newsletter #11
(The last of the series)

Attack the Near Enemy

Public Events
Islam frequently is represented at some public event where they hold forth on the “beauty of Islam”. Our scholar warriors must show up and pose difficult questions.

The Media
The news media is filled with misinformation about Islam. We must use letters-to-the-editor and guest columnists to correct and educate.

The letters to the media are an opportunity to be clever and harness all of our energies. In any such project we are faced with two limitations. We are largely ignorant, that is, we don’t have that many people who could be called warrior scholars. The second limitation is that we are not a community. Most people are isolated. We miss opportunities to use the force of numbers.

Let’s take an example: in 2006 in Minnesota Somali taxi cab drivers said that they did not want to carry passengers with bottles of alcohol from the air port. The airport authority was going to compromise with the Muslims, but they got over 400 e-mails from all over the nation protesting the creation of a separate level of laws for Islam. One e-mail, no matter how well written, does not have the influence of 400 e-mails.

We need a way to:

Create a community of scholar warriors
Select strategic and tactical targets
Launch mass attacks against a target

The Swarm software would help do all of the above. We must learn to work together as an army of scholar warriors.

Knowing the Far Enemy-The Tears of Jihad

We need to attack Islam along two fronts. The first is its political doctrine and the second is the history of its victims. Our ancestors have suffered too much to be thrown on the trash heap of history.

The Recovery Project
We must use two sources to recover the lost history of the victims of jihad. The first source is obscure historical works. There are some good out-of-print books that need reissuing. A second source of history is in other languages. The French have many works that need translation.

The out-of-print and foreign language books are the low-hanging fruit and easily picked. But there is another source of books-graduate students. Graduate students need thesis projects for masters and doctoral work. For a very small budget we can advertise grants and get top quality students to work and recover lost history. As an example, we could get African studies students to do work on the Islamic contributions to slave history.

Immigrant History
In Muslim countries, the kafir population is dropping like a rock. Countries that had a significant kafri population a century ago now have almost none. There are a handful of Jews left in Iraq. The people of the pharaohs, the Copts, are now only about 8% of Egypt’s population. Where do they go? They converted or went to the West.

Political Islam says that we live in dar al harb, the land of war. Proof that we live in the land of war is found in the refugees from jihad here in America. They are invisible. No one wants to know their history or horror. The growth of political Islam by jihad is a terrible suffering for the persecuted. Not only are their families and friends gone, but their cultures are gone too.

The first tragedy thrust upon these refugees is to be persecuted because they are not Muslim. The second tragedy is that no one wants to hear their stories. We must record their suffering to honor the dead and for use as weapons of war against Islamic imperialism.

Propaganda

We must develop a culture of film, video and audio propaganda. Books are necessary, but we must also have other sources of information. A system of making films and videos that can implement our strategy of building community, knowing the far enemy and attacking the near enemy.

This means that we need to build a film, video, audio, and financial culture to produce war propaganda. We must also prepare propaganda that is directed towards the blue collar workers. None of the books written today are of any use for the working classes. Short audio MP3 files can be used for everybody.

The Status of the Far Enemy

At this time, not one element of this strategy has been implemented at any real political level. However, political Islam has every single element of their strategy in place at the global, national, state, and local level.

The Advantages of the Islamic Political Doctrine
There are only three ways to discuss Islam. Religion, culture, and politics. You never make points by discussing religion. Their culture is their business. And the political aspect is all that harms us.

There are four ways to discuss Islamic politics: history, current practice, some Muslim’s personal behavior, or doctrine.
Islamic history is almost unknown and has been suppressed by our own fears. This has been covered in the section on Molested Children of Islam.

Current practice is what we see in the newspapers and on TV. This source is largely biased by the media elites never reporting the big picture about Islam.

Judging Islam by any Muslim’s actions is plagued by the question of how “Islamic” any Muslim is. There is only one solid simple ground to discuss Islam-its political doctrine as found in the Trilogy. It has many tactical advantages.Its facts can’t be challenged or denied. Any arguments based upon doctrine can’t be trumped. You can speak with absolute confidence. By definition, the doctrine is the real Islam.

The actual doctrine is precise and is now easily learned. The good news is that Islam never deviates from its “playbook” doctrine. Hence, it is easy to understand what they do and what they will do next.

You are bigot-proof. This entire work is based upon political doctrine. Not one Muslim is criticized. You can’t be a bigot in saying what Mohammed did and talking politics.

The facts of the doctrine are shocking and repulsive. You can win any debate with an apologist or Muslim by constantly returning to the doctrine. As long as you discuss doctrine you are winning. So when the apologist discusses how bad kafir policies are, how bad Christians are, or how they know a “good” Muslim; bring the talk back to the doctrine. You win.

The doctrine gives us the accurate language instead of multicultural, politically correct media language. changing the language. All of the names and terms used by Islam come from the Trilogy, but kafirs don’t use these terms or names. The jihad of Umar burst out of Arabia and crushed the Christian world of Syria, Egypt, and the rest of the Middle East. The Christians recorded it as an Arabic war. When Islam invaded Europe, Europeans called it a Turkish invasion. The jihad against Christian Spain was an invasion by the Moors. The Muslims called these events jihad.

In the early nineteenth century America sent the Navy and Marines to war against the Barbary pirates in north Africa. But the Muslims never called their naval raiders “Barbary pirates.” They called them ghazis, sacred raiders. Naming them “pirates” showed that the kafirs had no idea about the doctrine and history of Islam.

Look at the news today. The media report an intifada, uprising, by the Palestinians against the Israelis. But the terms intifada, Palestinian, and Israeli are misnomers. The truer terms are jihad, Muslim and infidel, if we follow the Koran. The doctrine of political Islam clearly states that jihad is to be waged by all Muslims against all Jews and other “kafirs.” Today is no different from 1400 years ago in Islam.

The events of 9/11 are recorded in the West as an attack by terrorists. Mohammed Atta, the leader of the 9/11 attack, was a pious Muslim. He left a letter clearly stating his intentions: 9/11 was pure jihad. An attack is a single event, but jihad is a 1400-year continuous process. Therefore, a terrorist attack is not the same as jihad. Terrorism does not have the same meaning as jihad.

Muslims’ names for their actions connect events and people with Islamic history and doctrine and show a continuing process. Kafir names are temporary, do not connect events, and show no meaning of historic process.

The only correct terms are those of Islam. The naming by the kafirs is wrong because the naming is a projection of Western culture. Correct naming leads to correct thinking.

This collection of tactics is incomplete, but is a place to start.

Conclusion
For 1400 years Islam has won a declared war against all. For 1400 years we have tried the strategy of appeasement. When threat did not work we have pretended that if you are nice enough Islam will be nice. We refuse to believe the doctrine of political Islam. It just can’t be true.

We cannot fight a defensive war to hold what we have. The war must be offensive and fought with the idea of defeating Islam. For 1400 years dhimmis have believed that some form of defensive coexistence can work. A defensive war against Islam has never worked for 1400 years and it won’t work now.

Islam’s power grows daily. Our government will not go to war against political Islam, but actually aids it through welfare, immigration and civil rights legislation.

For seven years since 9/11 individuals have studied Islam. But the time for individual effort is past. Those few who understand Islam must band together to form community, expose the far enemy and attack the near enemy.

It is simple. Fight or lose our civilization. Denial and pacifism are death of self and civilization.

Bill Warner

Copyright © 2008, CBSX, Inc. dba politicalislam.com

Use this as you will, just do not edit and give us credit.

Permalink: http://politicalislam.com/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-11/

6 Responses

  1. Douglas
    |

    im not no lawyer or anything really i this is what has got me going back to school and reading again. Sorry if i made a mess of your page here. I just thought i might get some pointers on what a middle class punk can do to help things outside this place

  2. Douglas
    |

    Western public in 3 words. Week , Dumb and Blind. Americans have got to be brainwashed or they just go along with it. They have the biggest military by far in the world. Yet they believe and a lot of Canada believe that there in danger. When i try to discuss the facts. The written and archaeology FACTS and for the most part ,If i can get through there thick skulls is,…ya i believe you but what am i going to do. That frustrates and angers me so much. I’ve read most all the Books and doesn’t the Quran say something about knowing and not doing anything warrants an entirety in hell. It reminds me of another,, i think Eisenstein said something about god has given us these Amazing minds but yet our back bone is all we use.. I’m on west coast island Canada and I see it. all plain as day. But when anyone talks about it they get ridiculed called crazy. They fear losing they status. A lot of Canada And sounds like all of the US are very easily convinced because of the last war. All the talk and shows on the war since then. I live up here and its to much. I can just imagine in the US. No television show Ive seen here No journalist.. Has ever talked about the facts , We seriously get brain washed daily.The only place i ever get any real intelligent discussions. People that see the history the money trail. On is the web. That’s what i hear on the web now that we only see the truth on sites that some of us talk on the web. I’m in my early 30s. anyone older usually don’t talk on the web they watch the “CIA i mean CNN news”. I don’t know what else i can do. I was thinking of starting to go into town and try getting random people talk. Maybe i could open some eyes up. I don’t care who calls me crazy. .. Ya I’m crazy, …..crazy about this world and the good people in it. It just makes me so mad.

  3. Douglas
    |

    Im from Canada and Ive done my history research alot latley. I see nothing but american news on tv and i hate it they yap around the issue and point fingers and cry wolf. Its so obvious what has got us all here. Nothing has changed. Im sick of the videos.We all know its happening.Plain as day.We all use our back bones but why are we choosing not to use the

    incredible minds..no offence.lets do more some how.IT MUST STOP WE MUST STAND UP AS MINDKIND.They all know were

    all talking.I bet thats been a key objective for a long time now. Now there

    setting there sights on central control.Its in high gear since the 50s and

    were just talking now. How do we get all the people to realize that Life is

    more than shopping and tv shows about jibberish. Theres a world out there.

    I love this planet. Iim so tired of a society that lost there strive for

    knowledge. I was born 78 and i feel like im living around zombies.i try

    talk about the real issues show the facts on our history and they all think

    “im crazy. lol” If there is a god and i believe there
    is.. we are looking like horrible tennents and a waste of space. Id give us last months.notice To start cleaning up or were out.! .

  4. Democracyistheanswer
    |

    Using correct terminology is the first step in this ideological warfare. The present-day ‘Somali pirates’ are actually ‘Somalis jihadists’ or ‘Somali ghazis’ (holy raiders).

    They immitate Mohammed.

    Westerners need to realize that this is a real war. War was declared by Ayatollah Khomeini…it is the Third Great Jihad.

    Western politicians need to begin to imitate Winston Churchill and use ideology to combat this evil, desert raider’s ideology of ‘infiltrate and destroy from within’.

    Our Western democracies now have dedicated jihadists rubbing shoulders with us daily. They are waiting for the right moment. Hello, Jihad Jane.

  5. Gig Searle
    |

    “You can win any debate with an apologist or Muslim by constantly returning to the doctrine”

    Believe me I am trying, but after Susan Winters was found guilty of defamation it gets harder.

    What is a (reasonably) convincing response to “its all exaggeration/prejudice, and they are no worse that christians, whose holy book is just as bad”? Actually it isn’t but that is not really the point!

    How can I get Islam off the list of religions and onto the list of political ideology?

    How can I persuade practising catholics that it is NOT THE SAME THING?

    I can feel myself reaching the point of exasperation and just wanting to scream Dhimmi and throw the idiots out of the window. Since this is, strangely, considered unacceptable in current PC Europe, a few short arguments would help my blood pressure.

    Gig

  6. John
    |

    This has been an awesome series on exposing Islam for what it is!

    I have been crossing posting this series (since about Part 9) on my website at SlantRight.com I have enjoyed them so much.

    Just a heads up though. I have noticed that some of the links do not work (at least on my browser). In this essay the links for “victims of jihad” and “politics” do not work.

Leave a Reply

We require registration to prevent excessive automated spam commenting.