Migration and Sharia

There is a mass migration from Islamic lands to Kafir lands. It is the mission of Islam to bring the Sharia into power, everywhere. There is an ethical divide between Islam and the hated Kafir civilization. It is the purpose of Sharia to dominate the Kafir civilization.

As Muslims immigrate, they immediately make Sharia demands. These demands are endless in details, but the process can take generations. We can see the centuries long transformation in the Middle East and Turkey which used to be Christian.

This does not mean that every Muslim takes part in the politics of Sharia, since only a few Islamic leaders are needed. The reason that Islam can win every attempt to advance Sharia is that Kafirs are tolerant of all demands and do not push back. So if our attitudes do not change, Kafir nations will become Sharia nations.
Миграция и шариат
Существует массовая миграция из исламских стран в страны кафиров. Миссией Ислама является ввести шариат в силу повсюду. Существует также этический разрыв между Исламом и ненавидимой цивилизацией кафиров. Цель шариата — преобладать над цивилизацией кафиров.
Как только мусульмане совершают иммиграцию, они сразу же начинают требовать шариат. Эти требования являются бесконечными в деталях, но этот процесс может занять многие поколения. Мы можем увидеть долгие столетия трансформаций в странах Ближнего Востока и в Турции, которые были когда-то христианскими. Это не означает, что каждый мусульманин участвует в политике шариата, поскольку требуется всего несколько исламских лидеров. Причиной того, что Ислам может добиться успеха в продвижении шариата, в том, что кафиры толерантны ко всем требованиям и не реагируют негативно. Так что, если наше отношение не изменится, то нация кафиров станет нацией шариата.

8 Responses

  1. Iftikhar

    Muslims in the West are not asking for Sharia to be the law of the land. The Law of the land is the only law applicable and executable in affairs of the individuals.

    All they are seeking is to let Sharia be available as an alternative to resolve their spousal and contractual disputes between two individuals. That is their prerogative. Indeed, every human, no matter who it is, goes first to their family members and friends for seeking solutions to their problem some will go to their clergy (all religions) and some will appoint a mediator.

    When Muslims go to their clergy, he or she will look up similar situations in the past and guide the couple or business partners to find a solution, since the immigrant Muslims are familiar with the Sharia laws, they may accept it, and if they do, that is good for them.

    The problem is that of trust – when the parties agree to the terms per their Imam/clergy, and don’t abide by it, there is no way the aggrieved party can seek damages for the violations. This is what Muslims are asking, to make that binding.

    Indeed, it would be binding if they go to the judge and say, we have agreed to these terms and conditions per our religious conviction, and seek the judge to sign the order and the court order becomes executable. The judge looks to it as mediator resolved decision and signs it and it will become executable. The right wing Americans are downright stupid and making a bid deal about this, as if Sharia will become the law of the land.

    What Muslims have is Personal Sharia, that is a private relationship between the individual and God. How they pray, worship, fast, pay zakat, how they bury their individuals, marry per the requirement as a religious rite. All of that is a private matter and does not need any regulation or execution.

  2. michael

    What’s happening in especially Wester Europe is beyond belief.
    Up until the 1960s, we had the best societies in the history of mankind regarding freedom, human rights, science and wealth. Then a new class that have been bred by the ruling left slowly took over.
    Our postmodernist, postsocialist, red-green leaders and media with their moral equivalence and truth relativism are destroying the western civilization at an ever higher pace. These people lack all of the virtues and values that made the western civilization the beacon of freedom and wealth.

  3. patricia.spayd

    Excelllent video Dr. Warner, and I loved the link to the Canadian fellow speaking on islamic immigration in Canada and his wish that Canada should have a spokesperson running fo President such as Donald Trump who said “we need to hit PAUSE on muslim immigration” KNOWING THESE PEOPLE HATE US – and want to CHANGE OUR FREE LIFE – NO FREE SPEECH for starters, then we need to keep these so called refugees in MUSLIMS LANDS. WITH 57 muslim countries – send any refugees to MUSLIM COUNTRIES so they’ll be HAPPY beating their wives, raping young girls under the guise of ”’wives”’, honor killing their own family members, and beheading each other, whipping women who transgress the black GAG BAG Dress code. We DON”T WANT ISLAM and DONT WANT ISLAM TO BE ANY PART OF OUR FREE NATION! Go DONALD, GO Dr. WARNER!

  4. […] Political Islam, by Bill Warner, Feb. 24, 20016: […]

  5. jcsharkxl

    @RCH: I was in India, visited Nalanda and some other destroyed sites, by muslims. Why do you believe, the muslims are going to be a majority, considering the low economical output of that group. How can they afford numerous offsprings, without cash? In Europe they are getting support from the governments for their children, unfortunately they are neither gifted nor talented, not like the diligent Chinese. Men having several spouses, then those “spouses” claim not to know the father, betraying the welfare state.
    @Bill Warner: I watched the “Counter Jihad”, where you warn, not to quote the koran. What, when I quote something from your vid and they deny it, as not found in that book? I would be grateful, if you could make further vids on that topic!

  6. vjmiro

    This is not entirely accurate. There’s been one notable instance of rejection and expulsion of installed Mohammedanism (calling it Islam pays homage to their stated goal of world submission).

    I am referring, of course, to the Spanish Reconquista which is the struggle the Spanish put up against Mohammedans for seven centuries (753-1492) until their final and definitive expulsion. This is -as far as I know- a historical one-off, i. e., the only example in history of one defeated/invaded people to successfully reject and send home the invader. Imagine the Normans sent home after 1066, or the English by American Indians, or the Romans from Gaul?

  7. ibid

    Thank you for your work on the subject of political Islam and “waking me up.” I have learned so much from you and am looking at world events with new eyes.

  8. anti-statist

    Dr. Warner, this was one of your best presentations! Thank you so very much for sharing this thought provoking and historically accurate overview.

Leave a Reply

We require registration to prevent excessive automated spam commenting.