Questions about Sharia for Candidates

Muslims are running for political office. We have the perfect forum for asking well crafted questions about Sharia.

They may say that Sharia is just a religious concept or that there are parts of Sharia they don’t practice. However, only part of Sharia is about how to practice Islam. But it is not enough to reject a particular part of Sharia. All of Sharia is based on the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. If you reject Sharia you must also reject the underlying Koran and Sunna. We must ask for the person to condemn and abjure the Koran and Sunna that support the rejected Sharia.

Take wife beating as an example. Wife beating is part of the Koran (4:34) and the Sunna. We must ask a Muslim not only to reject wife beating, but to condemn and abjure the Koran and Sunna that support the Sharia doctrine. In short, the Koran and the Sunna about wife beating is wrong.

The election season is upon us. We must use the political race as a golden opportunity to educate the voting public about Sharia and how to reject it.



2 Responses

  1. Bill Coleman

    Below are 2 url’s showing me asking an Islamic question of ’18 Republican Primary candidates in South Carolina. I was unable to get this question asked unless I was at stump meeting events where individuals could ask questions of the candidates … unfiltered from the floor …. i.e. the rules established by the organizers of an event will determine whether or not your question will be allowed. It is preferred to have the encounter videotaped or live streamed as was done in these two videos. If question is not asked at a videoed event, you should get the candidate’s permission to videotape or at least make it clear to the candidate that the encounter is being videotaped.

    The easiest and best way to surrender the U.S. snd/or South Carolina to Islamic jihad is to not Constitutionally and politically do enough to effectively stop or reverse jihad/the advance of Islam.

    We will not constitutionally stop or reverse the advance of Islam in the U.S. if present leaders, candidates and elected politicians run away from this QUESTION (below) and from effective constitutional counter jihad. A sure way to surrender politically to (outer) ISLAMIC JIHAD (“outer Islamic jihad” used here means the non-violent or violent advancement of Islam) is to lose the non-violent political battle against jihad … lost of that political battle means that sustaining Constitutional freedom would then require fighting and winning a bloody war against the combined forces of tyranny to the U.S. Constitution with the best possible outcome likely being a post war dictatorship that does what ever is necessary to keep the peace.

    “Do you believe that any advancement of Islam in the United States is an act of war against our freedom, our lives and all we hold dear?”.

    (Of course, I know both the correct answer and the “why” of my answer to this question. What is the reader’s answer to this question?)

    I have had no problem asking this question from Catherine Templeton (see that at 55:10 in this video … … ) and from candidates for SC House Districts 4 & 5 (see that at 67 minutes into this video … …) … at stump meeting events sponsored by the Pickens County Republican Party.

    Bill Coleman, Greenville, SC, 864-419-2797.

  2. JimmyinTEXAS

    Even if a Muslim denounces/condemns Sharia it means nothing. Sharia tells them to lie to infidels.

Leave a Reply