Vetting the Migrants

As Syrian refugees and other migrants are being brought to the US, we hear that we don’t need to worry about any nasty “terrorists” (jihadists, to use the right word), because they will be vetted.

We are worrying about the wrong kind of jihad. The “terrorist” is the least of our worries. Instead, we need to concern ourselves about the jihad of the increasing demands and use of Sharia. It is the Sharia that annihilates a native civilization. For an example, before the Sharia, Turkey was a Christian civilization. Today it is 99.7% Muslim. It was jihad that put the Sharia in place, and then, over the centuries, Christianity was annihilated.

Our vetting needs to focus on the Sharia, not just violence. The US has taken a stand against racial hatred, why not take a stand against Kafir hatred?

We need to say no to Sharia wife-beating, no to Sharia Kafir hatred, no to the Sharia killing of apostates, no to Sharia suppression of free speech, no to Sharia abuse of women.

When Islam came to Medina in the first migration, Medina was half Jewish and with some Arab Muslims. Five years later, Medina was totally Islamic and with no Jews. Annihilation by migration and Sharia is pure Sunna.

Why do we want American citizens who think our Constitution is haram (Sharia forbidden) and that Kafirs are scum? We need to vet all migrants and insist they repudiate political Sharia.

The oath of citizenship should read: I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, sovereignty, religious legal system of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen;

////////////
Проверка мигрантов
Посколько сирийские беженцы и другие мигрантоы в настоящее время стремятся в США, мы слышим, что нам не нужно беспокоиться о каких-либо неприятных «террористах» (правильнее сказать, джихадистах), потому что их будут проверять
Мы озабочены неправильным характером джихада. «Террорист» является нашей последней заботой. Вместо этого, мы должны проявить беспокойство по поводу растущего спроса на джихад и применения шариата. Именно шариат уничтожает родную цивилизацию. Например, до введения шариата Турция была христианской цивилизацией. Сегодня она на 99,7% мусульманская. Сначала джихад установил шариат, а потом, на протяжении веков христианство было уничтожено.
Наша проверка должна сосредоточить внимание на шариате, а не только на насилии. США приняли позицию против расовой ненависти, почему бы не занять позицию против ненависти к кафирам? Мы должны сказать нет шариатскому избиению жен, нет ненависти к кафирам, нет шариатскому убийству отступников, нет шариатскому подавлению свободы слова, нет шариатскому злоупотреблению в отношении женщин.
Когда Ислам пришел в Медину в первой миграции, Медина была наполовину иудейской, с небольшим количеством арабов-мусульман. Пять лет спустя, Медина была полностью исламской без иудеев. Уничтожение путем миграции и шариата есть Сунна в чистом виде.
А что мы имеем против американских граждан, которые считают, что наша Конституция является харам (запрещена шариатом), и что кафиры сволочи? Мы должны проверять всех мигрантов и настаивать, чтобы они отказались от политического шариата.
Присягу на гражданство следует читать так: «Я настоящим заявляю под присягой, что абсолютно и полностью отврегаю и отказываюсь от всех видов преданности и верности любому иностранному принцу, властелину, государству, суверенитету, религиозной правовой системе, которые или которым я до сих пор был подданным или гражданином».

11 Responses

  1. roger_russin
    |

    I fully agree with Bill. We need to vet incoming immigrants not only by interviewing them and checking their background but by adding to the citizen oath verbiage that renounces the specifics of Sharia on a line item basis without mentioning “Sharia” by name. Every new citizen would say the same oath. And we should repeat the oath as a nation on Independence Day each year. Of course the Muslims will say we are discriminating against them and we are, because they have some bad ideas that oppose our values. The Federal government enforced anti-polygamy laws and forced the Mormon church to comply, which they officially did comply. In addition, imams should be vetted for the same. If they cannot comply, then they can find a country where they fit in. Of course, this approach will be seen by radical imams and Muslims as oppressing Muslims, and thereby we may incur violent jihad or constant legal challenges.

    The state laws being passed in many states that disallow foreign law in US state courts, might not cover federal courts. Not sure on that. Financially supporting Dr. Bill Warner help’s educate citizens about the Koran, Hadith and Sira. I would also recommend supporting Brigitte Gabriel’s ACT for America which lobbies for those states to pass the no foreign law in state courts. Thanks to Bill we can understand the nuances of Islamic ideology helping us find a voice of resistance to treatment of the Kafir. We can then act in the political arena as well. Gabriel as a Christian teenager lived through 8 years of the Lebanese civil war, and she knows what fundamentalist Muslims are capable of. Check out her “Because They Hate” book as well as Bill’s collection of books.

    Also, learn about the Muslim Brotherhood and let’s ban by law…
    http://www.clarionproject.org/
    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5137/muslim-brotherhood-inquiry

  2. temorford
    |

    Islamic Terrorism is a global epidemic. We know about the US, UK, Europe, and Africa, but look up Russia and China and you will find that they all suffer from this cancer on humanity. There is only one place in my search so far that has no Islamic Terrorism, and that is Japan. Look it up for your self, and you will find the answer on how to remain free from this plague.

  3. mikewilken
    |

    Does the immigrant being vetted ‘pray’ 5 times a day toward Mecca? Within those 5 recitation sessions there are 17 calls to the Mohammadan god to DESTROY certain people.

    If we grant there are a billion Muslims that participate in this recitation practice, an unreasonably high number in my opinion but I’ll use that number for illustration. That would be 17 billion requests per day and over 6 trillion requests a year!

    Really that is quite a bit of begging to the Mohammadan god and so it must be obvious to the average Muslim that his god needs (requires) help to fulfill those yearly 6 trillion requests.

  4. DiogenesUSA
    |

    For a clear understanding of Islam and how Sharia Law will impact on the governments of western societies I would recommend an award winning book available at amazon.com.

    Allah of the Qur’an and the God of the Bible “Are They the Same?”.

  5. howiem
    |

    Technically isn’t every follower of Islam both a jihadist and a proponent of sharia law? How can they be compartmentalized? Should they be compartmentalized? Should we overlook people who are potentially murdering terrorists if they don’t happen to mention sharia law on Facebook? The tactics will simply be changed to train jihadists to refrain from using the word ‘sharia’.
    And given the concept of taqqiya, what good are oaths when they are taken by people who are expected to lie to further the cause of Islam? Oaths of citizenship do not stop anyone intent on killing in the name of Islam. It only takes one liar to either kill a lot of innocent people or to influence a lot of gullible people into pushing for sharia law. Even if a Muslim renounces Islam, that is no guarantee that the Muslim is not lying. And while taking oaths may mean something to some, it means nothing to others, and until the day that there is a foolproof vetting method, and honest people doing the vetting, taking in Muslim immigrants poses a risk to American citizens, and that should be the first, foremost and only consideration for a government whose paramount duty is to protect the nation according to the oath they took when they entered public service.

  6. Deirdre
    |

    Adding “political” to “religious legal system” might be better. Jews have a religious legal system for some things but these do not, as far as I know, impinge upon non-Jews, and there is no Jewish anti-apostasy law to fatalise leaving Judaism.

  7. roger_russin
    |

    Excellent presentation. We all need to practice this as seriously as Muslims practice political Islam.

    Now, can we say that Political Islam = a political party, like the Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Green Parties?

    Do we currently ban the Nazi and Communist Parties? If not, how can we ban a Sharia Party (or by any other stealth name)?

    If Political Islam is promoted by any Muslim organizations does that make them ineligible to be a religious non-profit?

    Should they register as a political party, though not sure how that happens and who governs such at the moment? This would at least force to them to declare a party status, a platform making their intentions known and published, etc. What would be the down side of this? The downside, is they lie and say they are for democracy and multiculturalism like the Muslim Brotherhood. It seems it would make the debate and criticisms of their platform to be tied to their platform as separate from the Koran and Sunna. It would have to stand on its own. Of course Muslims would be tying to their source documents, but we would not need to address that discussion. We could focus on say polygamy, equal rights, how to treat one another, and why hate “other”. So, we can say we love people who are Muslim but hate Sharia. I’m sure they will take that personally as not accepting the whole of “who they are”. However, wouldn’t they be vulnerable in having to explain how democracy and sharia are “compatible” when they are oppositional? They would have to renounce Sharia and stick to that.

  8. roger_russin
    |

    If you take sharia out of the Koran and Sunna, what’s left?

  9. roger_russin
    |

    Will making laws to limit sharia going to be effective in the long run? If not then are such laws slowing civilizational jihad? Should we start panel discussions between mosque imams and persons such as yourself and others who see sharia as the threat to our values?

  10. roger_russin
    |

    Many states have passed laws that disallow any foreign law in US courts. Do we need to add a law that disallows its citizens to function in private settings, as in an enclave of Muslims, to apply sharia law or a foreign law. Certainly, we have laws against abuse, polygamy, slavery, inciting to riot, murder, and disturbing the peace, but what about laws against teaching to hate “other”.

  11. roger_russin
    |

    Dr. Warner,

    1. Have you presented this to Immigration committees in the House and Senate for their consideration? Or I wonder which of our representatives could take this and shape House or Senate bill around it. Have you ever testified before House or Senate counter-terrorism or immigration committees?
    2. What if an enclave of Muslims on private property, as in commune, where practicing Sharia law, is that against any current US laws? Let’s assume those in the enclave are not actively pushing for sharia in the nearby towns to the enclave. However, those who leave the enclave and work in the community might agitate for some minor aspect of sharia.
    3. Is prayer 5 times a day considered part of Sharia?
    4. Do any mosques in the US implement sharia within their congregations? If so, is that legal under our laws now?

    Roger

Leave a Reply