Using the Five Principles to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.
October
Today we have a guest columnist-Dr. Babu Suseelan. It is interesting that Isalmic
morality is not discussed more often. Islam has a unique ethical system with
one set of ethics for Muslims and another set of ethics for the kafirs.
If you would like to be a guest columnist, contact us.
CAN MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS BE MORAL?
Dr. Babu Suseelan
All of us know daily occurrences of Jihadi terrorism, Islamic homicide bombing,
beheading of innocent kafirs, and organized, repetitive, regular and predictable
slaughter of Muslims by Shias and Sunnis in the name of Allah. In recent months
we have seen Islamic bloodshed, mass murder, beheading, and homicide bombing
in all countries with substantial number of Muslims. We have seen Muslims on
a murder march shouting "Allah Akbar" in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran,
Iraq, Lebanon, Georgia, India, Philippians, Sudan and Chechnya. These are not
a phenomena defined by the news media. Our judgments of reality based on daily
occurrences tell us more about Islamic terrorism. Indeed, we take these destructive
events for granted.
Beneath all the pictures and the prose on Jihadi terrorism and Islamic violence,
we are still struggling to understand what is going on in the name of Islam.
With all the freedom to discuss the subject of Jihadi terrorism, intellectuals
on the far left and on the far right (anti-Zionists) are holding on to vague
ideas about why Muslims resort to terrorism. They are ready to parade and promote
bogus theories of economic deprivation, lack of education, and political interferences.
Bogus intellectuals, Marxist Academicians and mindless media pundits resist
incorporating a truly accurate understanding of the root cause of Jihadi terrorism.
They merely transform their distortions and false myths into a new set of myths
and willingly accept distorted perceptions in place of reality. They are rewarded
by Islamo fascists in ways that they never quite understand. It is with Islamic
false propaganda in which they place their confidence about the root cause of
Islamic terrorism. Their faulty perception and irrational analysis are not sufficient
to answer the public questions, doubts and fears on immoral acts and destructive
acts of Muslim fundamentalists.
The general public must first be redirected from their eagerness to believe
in such bogus theories, phony perceptions, and irrational analysis or they will
stumble from one set of vulnerability to another set of immoral acts of Islamic
fundamentalists.
ISLAMIC MORALITY
Islam has a unique worldview. Islamic closed paradigm constitutes cultural patterns,
beliefs, moral values, and social norms shared by the people of Arabia during
the sixth century. For centuries, rigid, authoritarian and dualistic Islamic
worldviews have been shaping Islamic behavior. The Islamic closed channel thinking
is reflected in varied Islamic expressions as morality, social relationships,
interpersonal communication as well as their ethical acts
.
Muslims have a sense of togetherness and a common identity. They have a conviction
that they form a special group, as well as a sense of moral obligations and
a set of beliefs in the Koran that holds that Islam is the only truth and non-believers
are kafirs. Practically all Islamists share the view that Allah is the best
superior being, the one those non-Muslims should follow. Faith in Allah usually
accompanied by the belief that subjugation of non-Muslims is natural, morally
right, and it is in the best interest of Islam to convert all infidels.
The Koran and the Hadith are two great driving forces in Islam both individually
and socially. Islam provides a referent for the explanation of many events including
ethical decisionmaking, rituals, and socially unacceptable acts including oppression
of women, hostility against kafirs, honor killing, and Jihadi terrorism. It
constitutes a system parallel to and in many ways opposed to ethical philosophy,
and rational-humanistic systems.
For a Muslim, his life centers upon Allah and all his actions bear identifiable
relations to Allah. As such, Islam forbids critical thinking, moral reasoning,
and freedom of the will for Muslims. Equal status for women, self-examination
and the expansion of ethical reasoning are not allowed. Islam does not allow
introspection, creative imagination, aesthetic creation, humor and artistic
expression or search for the expressions of the infinite. Muslims are not allowed
the possibility of intellectual and emotional satisfaction through ethical and
spiritual life outside of Islam. Islamic institutions assume important role
to keep a firm hand over its non-rationality and direct its forces to restrict
individual moral initiatives
.
Islamic fundamentalists consider Islam is a complete ideology related to all
aspects of human nature concentrated on teleology, ethics, psychology and human
behavior of all humans for all the time
.
Islamic moral principles are a one-sided mechanistic, reductionist, non-compromising,
and closed. The closed, rigid, pre-determined and non-compromising Islamic paradigm
and moral directives tend to place Muslims in oppositional position in relation
to non-Muslims. The reductionist Islamic morality carries the assumption that
moral principles of non-Muslims are inferior and should be rejected.
For Muslims, moral directives of the Koran and Hadith are the expression of
ethics in operation. Muslims decide plan of action on the basis of Islamic values.
Muslims believe that only knowledge of the Koran and Hadith can help individual
Muslims solve conflicts between social and moral norms that create ethical dilemmas.
Islamic law reflects the will of Allah rather than the will of the moral majority
or the will of a human lawmaker. Allah's will reflect in Islamic law and it
covers all areas of life including moral behavior. In an Islamic context, there
is no such thing as a separate secular or moral authority and moral principles.
Muslims believe and follow shariah. Islamic shariah means submission. Shariah
seeks to establish that Allah is the divine lawgiver and no other law or moral
principle may exist but Allah's law and moral directives.
Islamic shariah includes both ethics and law. The Islamic law does not allow
behavior norms based on individual conscience. The doctrine of shariah and jihad
are fundamental because these are based on clear and authentic verses in the
Koran and Sunna and it is considered pivotal for Muslims until all infidels
are converted and Dar-Ul-Islam is established.
Muslims decide their plan of action on the basis of Islamic values and morality.
Islam impels all Muslims emotionally to perform human acts directed towards
Allah. Historically, there has been a very close connection between Islam and
morality. Muslims consider duties that are primarily directed towards Allah
and actions towards fellow believers and non-believers that are commanded by
Allah. Immoral acts are practiced as moral duty such as slaughtering animals
during Hajj, honor killing, Jihad war, beheading, limb amputation, stoning kafirs
to death, Islamic feasting during Ramadan, oppression of women, child marriage
and polygamy. These Islamic moral duties and rituals often lead to abnormal
perversions and socially disastrous consequences.
Islamic religious practices frequently conflict with moral codes of many societies.
Islam prohibits a Muslim living in a non-Islamic society to take moral action
that may conflict with Islamic guidelines. Islam indoctrinates Muslims against
the theoretical study of ethics, right civil conduct and moral action.
Muslim fundamentalists feel that there is nothing immoral about following the
dictates of Allah or any immorality in forcefully converting infidels or issuing
a fatwa against a kafir writing a book critical of Islam. Islamo fascists have
no moral qualm in beheading an innocent non-Muslim journalist or hijacking a
passenger plane in the name of Allah. Islamic fundamentalists committing immoral
and heinous crimes against humanity should always weigh whether an action is
morally right or wrong before the action is taken. Their commitment and love
for Islamic guidelines cannot make a wrong action morally right. Even if Muslims
are compelled to follow Islamic ethics that guide their actions, the difficulty
remains regarding the need to compromise between their conflicting Islamic values
to those of non-Muslims. Islamic fundamentalists should realize that knowledge
of the Koran and the Hadith is insufficient in itself for knowing how to behave
ethically. In this context, one is reminded of Kant who said that "morality….in
no way needs religion for its support." For Muslims, knowledge of ethics
is needed for better moral action, not blind faith in Allah.
CAN A MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALIST BE MORAL?
In view of the differences between Islam and morality, the question may be asked;
can a Muslim fundamentalist be moral? A Muslim can be moral without Islam. A
Muslim can do moral acts without emulating life style of Mohammed or his non-compromising
preaching. They should follow the voices of conscience and strive for morality,
ethical action, and harmony.
Morality implies adherence to social norms, laws, and civilized practices rather
than blind obedience to invisible Allah. Muslims who are obligated to Allah
should not obscure their obligations to morality and commitment to great intrinsic
value of humans. Islam rejects ethical principles and moral practices of non-Muslims.
Muslims seek answers by looking to and rediscovering irrational, outdated and
illogical ideas and expressions from the past. Islam rejects differing worldviews,
ethical philosophy and refuses to recognize changes in moral perspectives that
emphasize the inter-relatedness of individuals and community and their mutual
responsibility for one another.
The binary thinking and closed Islamic morality carries the assumption that
non-Muslims are unethical, immoral and inferior and should be oppressed and
forced to assume an Islamic identity. Non-Muslims are subjected to inhuman behavior
as parts of a systematic destruction of kafirs. Islamic religious leaders promoting
violence and terrorism against infidels express little shame, guilt, remorse,
empathy or ethical concern. Jihadi criminals minimize or deny injuring victims
by terrorism. They maintain feelings of uniqueness, tough mindedness by refusing
to consider the feelings of non-Muslims. Muslims consider immoral acts and violence
against infidels as not unethical but an opportunity to provide true Islamic
awareness and a phase of Islamic identity development.
Do Muslims enjoy freedom? Freedom presupposes choice. If there is no choice,
there is no freedom. Freedom is also not absolute. Ethics and moral action can
exist only if freedom of choice exists. A Muslim or a non-Muslim can be moral
if only he/she is free. Moral action is possible only if the freedom of the
will and freedom of choice exist. In Islam, the will of Allah is final and dominant.
Islam has forbidden freedom of choice, critical thinking, rational evaluation,
and moral decision making if it conflicts with predetermined directives of the
Koran
.
Philosophically, Muslims are un-free since they are imprisoned in the closed,
non-compromising, authoritarian and reductionist Islamic dogma. Freedom also
involves the capacity and opportunity to make moral decisions. Muslims are un-free
because they are prevented or prohibited from doing conscientious moral actions
if it conflicts with Allah's will. Islam imposes inner limitations and Islamic
religious leaders restrain them with external limitations. All these Islamic
inner and outer restrictions prevent Muslims from doing conscientious acts consistent
with social morality and ethical norms.
Islam teaches preconceived morality and fixed ideas about human relations and
ethical behavior. Discrimination, prejudice, physical violence, and unethical
behavior towards infidels are built often wittingly, into the very structure
and form of Islamic society. Muslims tend to ignore unchanging Islamic values
making them un-free and in moral blindness. They wish to remain ignorant of
certain concepts and directives in the Koran that make them unable to make a
moral choice without Islamic restraints.
Moral choice is possible only when one faces normal, better, acceptable and
universally acclaimed alternatives. When the better alternatives are good, preferable
and available, fundamentalist Muslims choose freedom from choice. Escape from
freedom and freedom from choice enables Muslims to make lesser, harmful and
dangerous Islamic choices. They rejoice their un-freedom when compelled to act
on Islamic directives that are morally wrong and universally condemned.
It is time for Muslims and non-Muslims to ask the following questions:
Does Islam assist Muslims in transforming themselves and the Islamic society
so that Muslims can welcome universal morality, preserve freedom, and promote
ethical conduct, peace and harmony?
Can Muslims generally pursuing situational ethics transcend the limited interests
of the Islamic community?
Both the Koran and Hadith are deficient and inadequate to serve as appropriate
theories of ethics for practicing Muslims faced with ethical problems and moral
dilemmas. Both deal with judgments in concrete situations based on subjective
perceptions of Mohamed. Mohamed made decisions dependent on specific situation
at hand. Mohamed's situational ethics was based on the uniqueness of each situation
for the advantage of Muslims. Muslims consider Mohamed's situational ethics
is guided by Allah and is universal and inflexible. Islamic situational ethics
prohibits Muslims from recognizing the existence of moral values and freedom
of choice to take decision according to one's conscience.
Muslims can be moral if they can abandon their stubborn assumptions and question
their absolute and monolithic norms. Muslims need to follow the rules of civic
law and universally accepted moral principles. Ethical decisions cannot be solely
based on Islamic values the guidelines of the Koran. In conclusion the question
still remains: Why Muslims are afraid of freedom? Why are they unwilling to
explore their moral decision-making?
Dr. Babu Suseelan is a professor of clinical psychology and the director of
a drug and alcohol treatment program in Pennsylvania. He writes on the subject
of Islamic terrorism and its effect on Hindu society.
Permalink http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/can-muslim-fundamentalists-be-moral/
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC
politicalislam.com Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.
If you are interested in donating to Political Islam, click below to begin.
As Mr. Warner has suggested, courses on Jihad and Sharia should be taught in
Political Science Departments in universities across the world. Similarly, courses on Islamic Ethics and Islamic Morality should be taught in Philosophy Departments in universities across the world.
This alone will make the world aware of the truth about Political Islam and Islamic Ethics and Islamic Morality."
Ramachandra Abhyankar — November 2, 2008 @ 3:30 PM
In his brilliant analysis, Dr. Suseelan answers his own question: "Muslims are un-free since they are imprisoned in the closed, non-compromising, authoritarian and reductionist Islamic dogma. Freedom also involves the capacity and opportunity to make moral decisions. Muslims are un-free because they are prevented or prohibited from (taking) conscientious moral actions if it conflicts with Allah's will."
Put simply, the answer is “fatalism”, according to Dr. Suseelan. Moslems never NEED to make an ethical choice, because fatalism implies there is never a choice. Their ethical faculty has been killed by Islam’s fatalism. When you are a fatalist, "freedom" need not apply.
We frequently read Moslems in the media saying things like, "We are not against free speech," (note the negative phrasing), "BUT, there is a limit to blasphemy!" Translation: “We ban all criticism of Islam.” Nothing illustrates the prison of Islam better than this. With such a statement (commandment really...and who gives mullahs the right to pontificate?), the Moslem is imposing his prison walls on the entire non-Moslem world. We MUST honor his tribal taboo, or else.
I personally find the "tribal" explanation of Islamic situation ethics the easiest one to follow: 1) A tribe's goal is to expand the tribe. 2) A primitive tribe has no concept of a philosophy or universal code of behavior, but merely sets of "taboos" and "totems". 3) Islam behaves in this primitive tribalistic manner. 4) Mohammed, the Koran, Allah, the Black Moon Rock are all totems. 5) The various purification rituals are the taboos.
A more urgent question is: Why are Moslems so willing to kill to suppress freedom of expression?
I would appreciate it if CSPI could thoroughly discuss this taboo commonly expressed by Moslems regarding the limits of free speech.
This is a legitimate question for a “political” study group like CSPI, because crushing the freedoms of others is a “political” issue and it is the MOST URGENT issue to address in the world today, imho. Without freedom of expression, we have no freedom at all."
Democracyistheanswer — November 7, 2008 @ 9:22 AM
500 years ago, no one could have believed that the Catholic Church would today, be a religion that abhores violence and teaches world peace.
But, the Catholic church was forcibly disarmed by secularists, and the European renaissance ensued.
In historic America, Protestant Christians found themselves the only military might in the early settlements, and quickly set about setting the rules for everyone else, and yes, the penalty could as easily be death as it could be flogging, or a day in stocks.
Krishna adjured Arjuna not to take pity on the physical bodies of his opponents, but to slaughter them in battle.
Every religion can justify violence, it's just that in most of this modern world, Islam is the only religion that is still armed.
Take away their weapons, and they too, are peaceful.
People are as convenient as they need to be, and Muslims are people.
In Dubai, Muslims are very aware that their own well being depends on the well being of their neighbors.
Dubai is an economic powerhouse. A lot of very good things come to Dubai via money, which comes to Dubai from the kafir.
Dubai does not like random violence, even in the name of Mohammedism, and they can justify their point of view by the scriptures of Islam.
We can all justify peace with our religions, as easily as we can justify war.
The thing is the weapons, not the religion.
Just above this window, as I write this, I see the signature of the last person to comment on this story.
It is "Democracyistheanswer"
I recognize the noble sentiment, but
democracy is not the answer. The answer is secular authority disarming religions.
Islam is the only religion in the world that literally could be destroyed by a single air raid.
Islamists should be made aware that the idols of the hadj could be destroyed with a minimum of bother or loss of life.
Currently, I think they have to believe it would be impossible to destroy that rock they like to dance around.
I believe the idols of the hadj should be held ransom by the kafir ( at the distance of an intercontinental ballistic missle) to force the good behavior of Muslims.
The religion of Mohammed is unique in that it could be physically destroyed. You don't need anything atomic. A single "bunker buster" per idol will suffice.
I believe that a single demonstration of the vulnerability of those idols would change the world.
Thank god for fundamentalists.
They're so easy.
That's what I think."
R Rogers — November 10, 2008 @ 10:47 PM
To the gullible faithfull, any perverted mulah can find and point to a rock anywhere in Arabia to replace the one destroyed by the "bunker buster".
The possible destruction of Mecca's and Medina's fetihs might shock, but would not ultimately paralyze the distorted jihadist minds (any more that the falling of our twin towers paralyzed the West).
Islam needs a moslem Martin Luther (long overdue) for its salvation from the obscurantism of the 6th century Arabia mindset.
Untill then ,let us grind our teeth, sharpen our FBI and M15 service minds, suffer our setbacks with dignity and strike mercilessly back, wherever and whenever we can. We have no other option."
Aris — November 15, 2008 @ 12:08 AM
nasheeds — November 26, 2008 @ 12:36 PM
Therefore Mr. Babu Suseelan u dont sound any less hindu please go back and do a better research u will find science, ethics, sociology, Philosophy name it all extrapolated from the great and Glorious Quran and Islam
Regards"
Anas Nasir — December 4, 2008 @ 8:32 PM
Reply to this Post: