Tyrannical European Court of Human Rights says Mohammed is a Prophet, if insulted there could be blood in the streets

 

By now many are familiar with the recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against Elizabeth Sabitch Wolf. This ruling states that “abusive attacks on the Prophet of Islam (Non-Muslims referring to Mohammed as the “Prophet of Islam” is an important detail to understand), [are] capable of stirring up prejudice and putting at risk religious peace, the domestic courts had come to the conclusion that the facts at issue contained elements of incitement to religious intolerance.

This statement by the ECHR indicates that in order to maintain religious harmony, citizens may not insult Mohammed, and this is more important than freedom of expression. This European ruling is in line with the Islamic principle of blasphemy. Under Sharia, criticizing Mohammed is equivalent to apostasy and punishable by death. Censoring ourselves to please the Sharia is an underhanded subversion of democracy, an attack on free speech—jihad of the pen and tongue—by our own hands. Without free speech, you no longer have a republic or a democracy, you have tyranny.

Furthermore, there are two important subtexts to be noted in the ECHR ruling…[continue reading]: Sharia law has now been inserted into the laws of member states – Leading expert on Islam

2 Responses

  1. zen153275
    |

    This is Submission is it not??

  2. Laurence
    |

    Thank you Mr. Warner for covering this. The stupidity of the ECHR is just astounding.

Leave a Reply